Re: IE c# client side
From: William Stacey [MVP] (staceywREMOVE_at_mvps.org)
Date: 12/25/04
- Next message: CTMAx: "public & private pages"
- Previous message: web1110: "Control as a form within an object"
- In reply to: Bob Grommes: "Re: IE c# client side"
- Next in thread: Nurchi BECHED: "Re: IE c# client side"
- Reply: Nurchi BECHED: "Re: IE c# client side"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 23:16:57 -0500
Speaking of FireFox... I must have been in the dark. I just installed it
today along with Thunderbird and after 5 minutes fell in love. Will use
them both as defaults. However the one thing I can't figure out in
Thunderbird is with ngs and how to "Show replies to my messages" only? As
far as .Net and IE, it does not bother me that framework would be required.
If you had to fall back to winforms and smart client, you would need it
anyway. So in my case, it would just be a requirement of the web service
just as if it had been a winforms app. Anyway... Merry Christmas to all,
and to all a good night! :-)
-- William Stacey, MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com "Bob Grommes" <bob@bobgrommes.com> wrote in message news:uzvTFXe6EHA.1452@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > Even if you could make this work the browser would have to support it on the > client and that would mean, at a minimum, the .NET runtime would have to be > installed on the client and probably the browser would have to be IE6 as > well. Unless 100% of your users are a captive audience under your control, > e.g., an intranet or a very tiny group of users where you can dictate the > appropriate client requirements, then you'd be sunk. > > All modern browsers support JavaScript, that is why it always gets used on > the client. That is also why VBScript was never widely used on the client > side even though IE easily supports it. Even when you can get away with a > different language in certain circumstances, for broader code reuse you want > to stick with something that will work anywhere and where browser vendors > will feel obligated to support it. I can't imagine FireFox supporting C# > for example, since it's a product of the Evil Empire. > > --Bob > > "Martin Honnen" <mahotrash@yahoo.de> wrote in message > news:e$XjZ7d6EHA.3124@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > > > William Stacey [MVP] wrote: > > > >> Can you do c# code instead of javascript in web pages (i.e. IE) at client > >> side today? > > > > Peter Torr of MS years ago showed how to use JScript.NET in IE: (two > > lengthy URLs here) > > > I don't know whether the techniques used to do that would allow to use > > another .NET language like C# however. > > > > -- > > > > Martin Honnen > > http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/ > >
- Next message: CTMAx: "public & private pages"
- Previous message: web1110: "Control as a form within an object"
- In reply to: Bob Grommes: "Re: IE c# client side"
- Next in thread: Nurchi BECHED: "Re: IE c# client side"
- Reply: Nurchi BECHED: "Re: IE c# client side"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|