Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application
From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP] (skeet_at_pobox.com)
Date: 10/23/04
- Next message: Richard Blewett [DevelopMentor]: "Re: dynamic types"
- Previous message: Jochen Kalmbach: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- In reply to: Roman Yankin: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Next in thread: Jochen Kalmbach: "[OT]: Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Reply: Jochen Kalmbach: "[OT]: Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:58:58 +0100
Roman Yankin <romayankin@mail.ru> wrote:
> I'm talking about the installed size. For instance in my case i simply want
> to write a small program on C# that emulates some abstract process (my lab.
> exercise). In our university class we got only Win2000 Pro and some IDEs
> (VS6, Borlands, etc...) obviously i can't install Framework there. And can
> someone explain me what's the sense in writing programs on .NET framework if
> you can't deploy a compiled app without libraries being installed on the
> client PC?
Would you say the same thing about VB, which also required libraries?
I'm not sure that it's obvious that you can't install the framework at
university - have you asked the sys admins whether it would be
acceptable?
-- Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
- Next message: Richard Blewett [DevelopMentor]: "Re: dynamic types"
- Previous message: Jochen Kalmbach: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- In reply to: Roman Yankin: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Next in thread: Jochen Kalmbach: "[OT]: Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Reply: Jochen Kalmbach: "[OT]: Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
