Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application
From: Andrew Ducker (Andrew_at_Ducker.org.uk)
Date: 10/23/04
- Next message: Andrew Ducker: "Asynchronous Sockets"
- Previous message: Robert Jordan: "Re: dynamic types"
- In reply to: Roman Yankin: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:26:31 -0700
"Roman Yankin" <romayankin@mail.ru> wrote in
news:eTnKwqRuEHA.1296@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
> I'm talking about the installed size. For instance in my case i simply
> want to write a small program on C# that emulates some abstract
> process (my lab. exercise). In our university class we got only
> Win2000 Pro and some IDEs (VS6, Borlands, etc...) obviously i can't
> install Framework there. And can someone explain me what's the sense
> in writing programs on .NET framework if you can't deploy a compiled
> app without libraries being installed on the client PC?
The same was true of (say) VB, which required VB DLLs to be installed. The
ones for .NET are much larger, but also much more comprehensive.
Andy D
- Next message: Andrew Ducker: "Asynchronous Sockets"
- Previous message: Robert Jordan: "Re: dynamic types"
- In reply to: Roman Yankin: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: C# WinApp as a stand alone application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
