Re: Interface-based programming
From: Patrick Kristiansen (patrick_at_sixulon.dk)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Niels Johansen: "BufferedStream class - asynchronous read is blocking ?"
- Previous message: Arne Rasmussen: "Re: Grabbing the F1 event"
- In reply to: Patrick Kristiansen: "Interface-based programming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Sep 2004 02:12:29 -0700
Funny. After having read most of Juval's book, I constantly tumble
across things involving interfaces or I try to extend the use of
interface to real life. My brain is fried.
Today the tumble was across a blog entry that compares interfaces and
abstract classes to the Peter Sellers movie "Dr. Strangelove". I just
thought I wanted to post the link here.
http://blogs.msdn.com/FinServGuy/archive/2004/09/25/234340.aspx
Regards,
Patrick
patrick@sixulon.dk (Patrick Kristiansen) wrote in message news:<457dae9b.0409250801.16533a2d@posting.google.com>...
> Hi group!
>
> I've been reading Juval Löwys "Programming .NET Components", and I
> think it is a very good book, giving nice guidelines on how to really
> exhaust the possibilities of .NET in general.
>
> Juval Löwy is indeed an advocate of using interface-based programming
> (he wrote a chapter dedicated to it, and he's using it througout the
> book).
>
> I have one simple question. When designing your own components, is it
> true - according to the rules of interface-based programming - that
> you should create interfaces for your clients to use, and advertise
> for them to do so? So every time I design a class, it should have a
> corresponding interface?
>
> Regards,
> Patrick
- Next message: Niels Johansen: "BufferedStream class - asynchronous read is blocking ?"
- Previous message: Arne Rasmussen: "Re: Grabbing the F1 event"
- In reply to: Patrick Kristiansen: "Interface-based programming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|