Re: Interface-based programming
From: Joe Mayo (jmayo_at_nospamAtCSharpDashStation.com)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: mt: "Where is Page_Load in Whidbey?"
- Previous message: Joe Mayo: "Re: CodeRush Anyone?"
- In reply to: Patrick Kristiansen: "Interface-based programming"
- Next in thread: Patrick Kristiansen: "Re: Interface-based programming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:22:16 -0600
Hi Patrick,
I agree that it's a pretty good book. I worked on a project that used
interfaces extensively and they solved a lot of problems in the context of
that application. So, I am an advocate of interfaces an encourage their
use. Some projects don't use interfaces, except for when they have to,
which I think is thier loss.
Joe
-- http://www.csharp-station.com "Patrick Kristiansen" <patrick@sixulon.dk> wrote in message news:457dae9b.0409250801.16533a2d@posting.google.com... > Hi group! > > I've been reading Juval Löwys "Programming .NET Components", and I > think it is a very good book, giving nice guidelines on how to really > exhaust the possibilities of .NET in general. > > Juval Löwy is indeed an advocate of using interface-based programming > (he wrote a chapter dedicated to it, and he's using it througout the > book). > > I have one simple question. When designing your own components, is it > true - according to the rules of interface-based programming - that > you should create interfaces for your clients to use, and advertise > for them to do so? So every time I design a class, it should have a > corresponding interface? > > Regards, > Patrick
- Next message: mt: "Where is Page_Load in Whidbey?"
- Previous message: Joe Mayo: "Re: CodeRush Anyone?"
- In reply to: Patrick Kristiansen: "Interface-based programming"
- Next in thread: Patrick Kristiansen: "Re: Interface-based programming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|