Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: Nak (a_at_a.com)
Date: 09/14/04 

Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:15:59 +0100

Jonathan,

> Nick,

Yup?

> Please clarify what you are trying to say here. Our Decompiler.NET
> product is an application, not an "aplette". The version we ship is
> protected both with encryption and obfuscation.

LOL, get off your high horse, put your sandwich board down and shut the f*ck
up! You are starting to sound very irritating indeed! I will call your
application an "aplette" until I am blue in the face, this is not a
violation of anything other than your pride!

> Attempts to decompile
> it or bypass our license enforcement strategy are also a violation of
> our license agreement and we utilize the legal system to protect our
> proprietary intellectual property. The product was written entirely at
> Jungle Creatures, Inc. aside from the 3rd party libraries licensed and
> fully credited in the application About Box.

Refer to my previous statement you paranoid little man,

> I would *never* do that! nope nope nope.

What part of that do you not understand? Secondly why the heck would I
*want* to look at your code? I have far more pressing matters at hand than
to care about anyone elses source code, obfuscated or not! So don't start
attempting the threaten me with "the legal system" until you have something
to threaten me with you fool.

> Please try to avoid making inaccurate negative statements about our
> products in public forums. Our product mentioned in this thread was
> mentioned by the original post, and there is no attempt here to
> advertise our products, only to respond to technical concerns
> mentioned by the original post, and to refute inaccurate assumptions
> or accusations made about our products or company in public forums. If
> you don't want to see our products mentioned, than you should refrain
> from making statements about them in public forums that require us to
> respond.

Bla bla bla, yadda yadda yadda, there are always people like you in
newsgroups, always! It's a shame you can't obfuscate your adverts so there
is no hope of me understanding them!

Nick.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code
    ... > protected both with encryption and obfuscation. ... > our license agreement and we utilize the legal system to protect our ... Bla bla bla, yadda yadda yadda, there are always people like you in ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc)
  • Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code
    ... > protected both with encryption and obfuscation. ... > our license agreement and we utilize the legal system to protect our ... Bla bla bla, yadda yadda yadda, there are always people like you in ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code
    ... > protected both with encryption and obfuscation. ... > our license agreement and we utilize the legal system to protect our ... Bla bla bla, yadda yadda yadda, there are always people like you in ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: ASP.NET 2005 hack-proof?
    ... Obfuscation is not fool-proof once the DLL is obtained. ... So, the amount of trouble, time, and expense to protect intellectual ... >> It will deter the casual decompiler, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: How do I remove MSIL from my native executable?
    ... wrapping it up in a security envelope like HASP. ... With obfuscation you get all the code, ... concerns limitations to forwards compatibility and interoperability implicit ... addressed in the documentation of many products used to protect VS2005 ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)