Re: free database server for desktop application with ado.net driv
From: Daniel Jin (DanielJin_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: Raymond Lewallen: "Re: Internal constructor "visible" outside of assembly. (BUG IN COMPILER CONFIRMED, EXACT CODEEXAMPLE TO REPRODUCE INCLUDED)"
- Previous message: Fraser Michael: "Re: Hashtable question"
- In reply to: Patty O'Dors: "Re: free database server for desktop application with ado.net driv"
- Next in thread: Luminal: "Re: free database server for desktop application with ado.net driver"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:29:02 -0700
you seem to be very confused at best.
as Adam said, MySQL supports many operating systems, including win32. and
it has precompiled package for many standard environments, which means you
don't have ot fiddle around with the compiler if you are in one (win32
happens to be one).
"Patty O'Dors" wrote:
>
> > What are you talking about? Who said anything about Linux?
>
> MySQL is widely known to be a GNU/linux-based project. Don't anybody be
> fooled. I know.
>
> >
> > First of all, there are precompiled binaries available for MANY different OS's,
>
> If it's produced for many different operating systems, it's a bit like
> saying it's "Jack of all trades, master of none".
> The advert "works on many different operating systems" is a synonym for it
> being largely linux-based - what with all these 'solaris' and 'OS/2' and 'arm
> elf' builds, etc...eeeurgghh!!!
> You do realise that the main pleasure people get out of these programs is
> simply being able to get them to compile on their particular version of linux
> on the particular processor they've got, and discussing the trials and
> tribulations of their silly little compilation capers on various stupid
> weblogs that clutter up google ?
> Of course, many of the different versions of linux can each be worked on
> many the weird hybrid processor varieties, further adding to the delight they
> take in confusing windows users with the umpteen different combinations of
> compilation settings that ensues.
>
>
> >including various flavors of Linux.
> > Might want to look at:
> > http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/4.0.html
> > before you make a statement like that. Of the probably over 50 different packages available for download there, only 3 are source.
>
> I don't want to get into surfing these people's web pages. It's a bottomless
> pit, that leads nowhere. If MySQL is that good, why are there FIFTY different
> packages? I'll tell you why - they don't all work. You have to hunt for the
> one that does. But then again, that's obviously what GNU fans think the fun
> of computing revolves around.
>
>
> >
> > Second, as this is a primarily windows-using newsgroup (Mono isn't quite that big yet), it is a safe assumption that, unless stated
> > otherwise, we are discussing Windows.
>
> Well, maybe you shouldn't raise the topic of linux and GNU-based programs
> like MySQL then. (Not saying YOU personally did... but someone did)
>
> >
> > And, even if there WEREN'T any compiled binaries available... this is a DEVELOPMENT newsgroup... if you can't compile source code
> > you probably have some other problems to see to first.
>
> I am perfectly capable of writing AND compiling source code, and complex
> source code at that - but that doesn't mean I should be any good at building
> GCC or MySQL or any other stupid GNU-based program. I don't have to be - if i
> don't ENJOY downloading it and compiling it, I can't see where it's going to
> actually GET me in anything less than a matter of years, that a windows
> program won't in a few minutes...
>
> After all, if a program's had salaried programmers working on it, who've
> still got a wife and kids to feed if they get the sack for the program not
> being good enough or not working, they're going to make damn sure it works
> and that the version that works is the only one that gets released. These
> open source - yes, ok anybody may be able to improve on it. But at the end of
> the day, the ones that are going to be able to improve on it best have
> probably got other, more lucrative things to do.
>
> They don't have anybody to answer to if it doesn't work, as no-one's paid
> them any money. Stands to reason that it's not going to work!
>
>
> >
> > Adam Clauss
> > cabadam@tamu.edu
> >
> >
> >
- Next message: Raymond Lewallen: "Re: Internal constructor "visible" outside of assembly. (BUG IN COMPILER CONFIRMED, EXACT CODEEXAMPLE TO REPRODUCE INCLUDED)"
- Previous message: Fraser Michael: "Re: Hashtable question"
- In reply to: Patty O'Dors: "Re: free database server for desktop application with ado.net driv"
- Next in thread: Luminal: "Re: free database server for desktop application with ado.net driver"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
