Re: underscore prefix
From: Scott Allen (bitmask_at_[nospam)
Date: 07/05/04
- Next message: Ram: "Re: User Must Change Password At Next Logon - LDAP And .NET"
- Previous message: Scott Allen: "Re: Why FXCop recommends me not to do this way of method calling?"
- In reply to: Tamir Khason: "Re: underscore prefix"
- Next in thread: Rakesh Rajan: "Re: underscore prefix"
- Reply: Rakesh Rajan: "Re: underscore prefix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:45:37 -0400
I think the guidlines actually discourage use of m_ when it says "Do
not apply a prefix to field names or static field names."
-- Scott http://www.OdeToCode.com On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:40:41 +0300, "Tamir Khason" <tamir-NOSPAM@tcon-NOSPAM.co.il> wrote: >This is olb naming convention for private variables. In new MS naming >convention you should use m_ as prefix for private members >More information can be found here >http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpgenref/html/cpconnamingguidelines.asp >or use FxCop to validate >http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/fxcop/
- Next message: Ram: "Re: User Must Change Password At Next Logon - LDAP And .NET"
- Previous message: Scott Allen: "Re: Why FXCop recommends me not to do this way of method calling?"
- In reply to: Tamir Khason: "Re: underscore prefix"
- Next in thread: Rakesh Rajan: "Re: underscore prefix"
- Reply: Rakesh Rajan: "Re: underscore prefix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|