Re: [OT] Chinese Syntax
From: red floyd (redfloyd11_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 05/30/04
- Next message: meh: "treeview click event"
- Previous message: Raphaël Arbuz: "Re: ORacleConnection problem"
- In reply to: Dan Pop: "Re: [OT] Chinese Syntax"
- Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Chinese Syntax"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 May 2004 19:35:09 -0700
Dan.Pop@cern.ch (Dan Pop) wrote in message news:<c956k1$p2m$4@sunnews.cern.ch>...
> In <bu1cb0ltl9jqhs7pgpjeht4dh6jd4qbsac@4ax.com> Alan Balmer <albalmer@att.net> writes:
> None of the programming languages assigning semantics to indentation
> has ever become mainstream. There must be a reason...
Not true. You're living in the present. In the past, when punch card
input was the norm, indentation had a meaning. In particular, FORTRAN
IV required input to begin in column 7 (or was it 8?), with a '*' in
column 6(7) as continuation...
DISCLAIMER: It's been nigh onto 25 years since I've done FORTRAN IV.
My info on the specific columns may be incorrect.
- Next message: meh: "treeview click event"
- Previous message: Raphaël Arbuz: "Re: ORacleConnection problem"
- In reply to: Dan Pop: "Re: [OT] Chinese Syntax"
- Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Chinese Syntax"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|