Re: No .NET framework
From: William Stacey [MVP] (staceywREMOVE_at_mvps.org)
Date: 02/25/04
- Next message: Roy Fine: "Re: convert to c++"
- Previous message: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Language question"
- In reply to: gabriel: "Re: No .NET framework"
- Next in thread: Stoitcho Goutsev \(100\) [C# MVP]: "Re: No .NET framework"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:49:42 -0500
And why should they? Besides if you want it to be portable, load vmWare on
the Unix box and move your app over - Portable...No? <Just Kidding> If you
really want to write console apps and not use any framework or other MS
libraries, then why not just use GNU and vi/emacs, etc. AFAICT, you have
port issues in both directions. To get most unix programs to run on
windows, you need something like Cygwin (or other) right?
-- William Stacey, MVP "gabriel" <no@no--spam.com> wrote in message news:8a23e$403b944c$d01d981e$31796@msgid.meganewsservers.com... > Cesar Garcia wrote: > > > same configuration = same OS > > loose portabilty = you cant run your app in another OS... > > Portability and .NET do not go int eh same sentence... > > > -- > gabriel
- Next message: Roy Fine: "Re: convert to c++"
- Previous message: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Language question"
- In reply to: gabriel: "Re: No .NET framework"
- Next in thread: Stoitcho Goutsev \(100\) [C# MVP]: "Re: No .NET framework"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|