Re: MMC 3.0 and .NET 1.1 ???


I didn't find whether MMC 3.0 supports VS2003 and .NET 1.1 in MSDN
documentation.

MMC 3.0 requires .NET 2.0 AFAIK.


I checked the microsoft.managementconsole.dll
installed to c:\WINDOWS\system32. It is .NET 2.0 assembly. Does it
make sense? I thought .NET 2.0 assembly cannot run on .NET 1.1
framework.

Do you actually have any snap-ins written in managed code running?


Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [C# MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Selecting from multiple .NET versions
    ... AFAIK, this is what Mattias told, that is it allows to *run* the 1.0 ... There is a MSBee projet that should allow to really build an executable ... detailed information. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: How to receive an array of doubles using VB from a C DLL
    ... I am going to revert to my shim code approach as I did in the Compact ... Framework, and will report back if I get it working. ... Mattias Sjögren mattias @ mvps.org ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Framwework 2
    ... Thanks Mattias. ... But When i open Visual studio 2003, i am not able to use the .NET framework ... version 2.0 APIs. ... Is it possible to configure visual studio for this. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: which famework will be used
    ... Mattias Sjögren wrote: ... The real framework 3.0 will not come until framework 3.5. ... it does not lack elements of confusion. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Remoting with Named Pipes for version 1.1
    ... >IPC using named pipes for framework 1.1? ... Mattias ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)