Re: Suggestion to learn .net 2.0 and above


You can't really do any ASP.NET without knowing a compliant programming
language like VB.NET or C#. It makes more sense to learn C# than VB.NET
because the syntax for C# and JavaScript is exactly alike and the grammar
nearly so. JavaScript is required for code that runs in the client (the
browser) and the C# code runs on the server (the web server). So you learn
two languages for the price of one (more actually but this will do for now
as many languages share the C syntax and grammar but VB does not).

Go to Deitel & Deitel [1] and make a note of a couple of their C# "Learn to
Program" textbooks. Then have your local Barnes & Noble order them for
review. Look them over and buy the one that is best for your learning level.
Deitel publishes the best programming textbooks used in classrooms
everywhere and you will learn C# doing the lessons in the book. Then start
learning ASP.NET.

Download the free Visual Web Developer Express and SQL Server Express and a
textbook from Deitel & Deitel. You're ready to go...

<%= Clinton Gallagher
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/

[1] http://deitel.com/



"Peter" <Peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D62480E2-6F61-462E-8776-60511932BF12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I want to learn .net 2.0 and above. I have no knowledge in .net at all.
There are Visual Studio 2005 Virtual Labs and Visual Studio .NET 2003
Virtual
Labs in MSDN. My understanding is that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is for
.net
1.0. However, it seems to me that the VS .net 2003 labs may be better
than
VS 2005 labs for beginners like me. Should I start from VS .net 2003 labs
or
go directly to VS 2005 labs?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: compiler for Chinese development language
    ... This relates to the development of vernacular ... Indian vernacular display, OS and programming languages. ... Bangla and other vernaculars. ...
    (comp.compilers)
  • Re: Head-in-the-Sand Liberals (LA Times Columnist)
    ... You claimed to have known several computer languages, ... If you lie about knowing computer languages, ... of the programming loop for a functional ... You also don't know Java. ...
    (rec.org.mensa)
  • Re: Is there a mainframe skills shortage?
    ... That's because the author of the article is comparing it to standard SQL. ... and material around Lamdas and functional programming. ... obvious which languages were the ones to learn. ... stick to writing system software and leave applications to the COBOL ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: LISPPA
    ... >> a match for such imperative languages as C, ... >comparing Lisp with languages like C, Pascal and Basic, ... I can accept that Lisp tries to compensate of the lack of compile-time ... If you have tools of visual programming, nice editor, advanced ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: GoTo in Java
    ... Scripting languages are programming languages; ... override the method.via an interface, or write a new method in the wrapper. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)