Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- From: "Markus Klein" <wushh@xxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Oct 2006 10:49:35 -0700
Thanks for your Answer.
Will be the WinApi in Vista diffrend?
Michael Nemtsev schrieb:
Hello Markus,
WinAPI is too big to be completly replaced by .NET
.NET only covers some (most used/popular) parts of API, and for some cases
you need to use Platfrom Invoke to call you WinAPI functions to get the required
functionality
MK> Hello,
MK>
MK> Does .Net 3.0 offering the same possibilities like Windows API?
MK>
MK> is .NET 3.0 going to replace the win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
MK>
MK> No Access anymore to win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
MK>
MK> Greets Markus
MK>
---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- From: Michael Nemtsev
- Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- References:
- Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- From: Markus Klein
- Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- From: Michael Nemtsev
- Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- Prev by Date: Re: Time Zone and DateTime voes.
- Next by Date: Compiling Into A Legacy Framework Version?
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- Next by thread: Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|