Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: "Randolpho" <randolpho@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 May 2006 12:46:29 -0700
I don't kown what exactly it adds (the paper mentions "low level constructs"
but my guess would be it's a bit more than just syntactic suggar but likely
"real" additional low level features aimed at writing something like an
OS)..
Whoops, you're right. Sing# adds also adds "low-level constructs
necessary for system code", whatever that means. It can't mean
pointers, since that's available in C#. Perhaps it's embedded ASM or
ILASM.
They don't show any Sing# code other than the syntactic sugar for
messaging I mentioned, which is probably why I forgot about it.
.
- References:
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Randolpho
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Patrice
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Christopher Reed
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Patrice
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Randolpho
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Patrice
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Install Project Custom Action Failure
- Next by Date: Re: Install Project Custom Action Failure
- Previous by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Next by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Index(es):