Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: "Christopher Reed" <carttu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 22:13:44 -0500
Singularity is written mostly with C#. I believe that makes it written in
..NET.
--
Christopher A. Reed
"The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient."
"Patrice" <scribe@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OFT$JFhbGHA.3632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MSOffice is likely quite a big application and I doubt it would be easy to
rewrite the whole thing in .NET just to be at the same point. Also despite
Singularity (which doesn't use .NET as we know it) .NET is an application
Framework i.e. it would likely make much more sense to write a end user
such as a CRM toll using .NET rather than a DB toll. MSOffice likely lies
in between.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Patrice
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- References:
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Randolpho
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Patrice
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Prev by Date: RE: Changing the Selection of iHTMLTxtRange
- Next by Date: Re: Fastest way removing duplicated value from string array
- Previous by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Next by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|