Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: "CMM" <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:51:08 -0400
Until the Visual Studio IDE is written in .NET, I wouldn't call either MFC
or COM redheaded stepchilds. The VS IDE is one huge COM application.
--
-C. Moya
www.cmoya.com
"Randolpho" <randolpho@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1146575364.159667.102820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DHarry,
WinFX runs on .NET 2.0, so if MS continues to support WinFX, MS will
continue to support .NET. Also, MS continues to support MFC, even
though it's now the red-headed stepchild to .NET.
Will .NET go away? I doubt it. As evidence, I offer the following.
Have you ever heard of singularity? Check it out:
http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/
That's right... Microsoft tried to write an OS in .NET, and from what
I've read, did a fairly decent job of it. .NET isn't going away anytime
soon -- although I wish the name would.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Randolpho
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- References:
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Randolpho
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Prev by Date: In 2005 C++, how to insert a virtual override?
- Next by Date: Re: Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
- Previous by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Next by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|