Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: "Patrice" <scribe@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:53:12 +0200
MSOffice is likely quite a big application and I doubt it would be easy to
rewrite the whole thing in .NET just to be at the same point. Also despite
Singularity (which doesn't use .NET as we know it) .NET is an application
Framework i.e. it would likely make much more sense to write a end user such
as a CRM toll using .NET rather than a DB toll. MSOffice likely lies in
between.
--
"DHarry" <DHarry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
01C99001-9D4B-4F91-9C9A-800D3E786527@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I never heard from Singularity before... but wow... it gives me a new
opinion
about .NET.
I often read and heard that Microsoft said that ".NET is the future" and
that's the reason I opened this thread.
I never heard before that MS wrote an application in .NET (excluding
"Singularity") But why? Because of security or reverse engeneering? For
example why is MS Office not written in .NET?!
Ok... Singularity... it's a research project, and depending on my
knownledge
about the strategies of Microsoft, I don't believe that MS will release
anytime (to unsecure, reverse engeneering, ...)
(...)
The reason I asked for the future of .NET, is that I want to specialise me
on one language for my applications released next.
I'm looking after a secure, new and powerfull language which won't be
"out"
in the next years.
Greets from Germany
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Christopher Reed
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Patrice
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- References:
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- From: Randolpho
- Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Autosaving in asp application
- Next by Date: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Previous by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Next by thread: Re: The future of .NET 2.0
- Index(es):
Loading