Re: Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
- From: "Randolpho" <randolpho@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 May 2006 08:08:58 -0700
I very rarely get poor responsiveness on .NET software. I wonder if
perhaps you're imagining things? If, however, there *is* poor
performance on a .NET application, I would blame one of two people:
either a) you are running .NET on a 486 sx 30 with 4 MB ram, or b) the
programmer(s) didn't understand how to write Windows.Forms. In the case
of Norton Antivirus, I'd say this is highly likely, as Norton has a
history of writing bloated crap that ruins your computer and is harder
to uninstall than most viruses.
Virii?
.
- References:
- Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
- From: Jim Hubbard
- Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
- Next by Date: Re: Saving an image of a WinForm to a file
- Previous by thread: Re: Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
- Next by thread: Re: Why are .Net UIs slower than C++ or classic VB?
- Index(es):
Loading