Re: .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- From: "Marina" <someone@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:12:25 -0500
I have found 2003 to be very stable, actually. I have personally no issues
with bugs of any sort.
2005, by contrast, I have found to be buggy, not to mention considerably
slower then 2003.
"PawelSokolowski" <PeeS290@xxxxx> wrote in message
news:e5SBjqKDGHA.812@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi all,
>
> I have switched from VC 6.0 to .NET 2003 about 6 months ago.
> I regret it every day since.
> It's uncomfortable, it breaks all habits from VC6.0 (Class Wizard, I will
> miss you forever).
> It's buggy, I am never sure what's going to happen, especially in resource
> editor.
> It produces some strange file instead EXE.
>
> How about 2005 ?
> What are your impressions ?
> Is it any better ?
>
> Best Regards
> PawelS
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- From: clintonG
- Re: .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- References:
- .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- From: PawelSokolowski
- .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- Prev by Date: .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- Next by Date: Re: C++ DLL to C#
- Previous by thread: .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- Next by thread: Re: .NET 2005, any thoughts ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|