Re: Stand Alone EXE

From: Jim Hubbard (reply_at_groups.please)
Date: 03/20/05 

Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:07:46 -0500

"Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:%23RJJZDULFHA.3988@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Jim,
>
> Why are your messages forever completely fulfilled with this kind of
> sentences in it.
>
>>
>> Thinstall is not for everybody. It is more appropriate for professional
>> developers and those that make a living selling software or supporting a
>> large company infrastructure.
>>
>
> What do you mean with that. What persons are excluded in your message and
> what can we do with Thininstall when we are in the category "and those
> that make a living selling software or supporting large company
> infrastructures".
>

I mean that Thinstall, because of the price, is probably not worth it if you
develop freeware or if your software is of limited distribution. Only you
can tell if your current software sales will justify the purchase.

Almost any Windows application distribution can benefit from Thinstall.
Whether it is financiall beneficial is a call for each developer.

Jim Hubbard

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stand Alone EXE
    ... > Thank you very much Jim! ... > Preferably I would like to just release a single .EXE program simply ... you run Thinstall and point it to your ... you can use Thinstall to wrap the exe and only the portions of the ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Stand Alone EXE
    ... The pricing structure has changed. ... You'd have to contact Thinstall ... Actually.....distributing the .Net framework is more of a bandwidth thing ... Jim Hubbard ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Stand Alone EXE
    ... >> change behaviour at all. ... your Thinstall app is not affected. ... Jim, we get the idea. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)