Re: Stand Alone EXE
From: Michael A. Covington (look_at_ai.uga.edu.for.address)
Date: 03/18/05
- Next message: MGB: "Support for c++ .net 2003?!"
- Previous message: mha: "Re: Color Scheme"
- In reply to: Jim Hubbard: "Re: Stand Alone EXE"
- Next in thread: Jim Hubbard: "Re: Stand Alone EXE"
- Reply: Jim Hubbard: "Re: Stand Alone EXE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:39:36 -0500
"Jim Hubbard" <reply@groups.please> wrote in message
news:lqmdnSv5MuVt6qffRVn-jw@giganews.com...
> First, you never have your application's files overwritten (i.e. DLL
> Hell). Second, your users don't need administrative rights to run the
> application. Third, your users don't need the .Net framework installed.
Only the third of these is different from normal life with .NET Framework,
as far as I can tell...
But it sounds useful.
- Next message: MGB: "Support for c++ .net 2003?!"
- Previous message: mha: "Re: Color Scheme"
- In reply to: Jim Hubbard: "Re: Stand Alone EXE"
- Next in thread: Jim Hubbard: "Re: Stand Alone EXE"
- Reply: Jim Hubbard: "Re: Stand Alone EXE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|