Re: VB vs C#
From: CMM (CMM_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Joshua Flanagan: "Re: Windows Service Launching C# App"
- Previous message: Joshua Flanagan: "Re: How to dynamically load strong name assemblies"
- In reply to: Gerry Hickman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Next in thread: Sean Hederman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Reply: Sean Hederman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Reply: Gerry Hickman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:43:01 -0800
Aren't all those things true of Java as well? Is that "the language" of the
future?
"Gerry Hickman" wrote:
> Rena wrote:
>
> > I really would like to know the managment of MS, will put more effort on
> > either VB or C#,
>
> I don't know what MS will do, but C# is the language of the future. It's
> been rubber stamped by the ECMA, is more closely related to PERL and
> JScript than VB, and can work outside the Microsoft framework.
>
> I'm glad I chose C# three years ago because I won't need to "migrate"
> for a long time!
>
> --
> Gerry Hickman (London UK)
>
- Next message: Joshua Flanagan: "Re: Windows Service Launching C# App"
- Previous message: Joshua Flanagan: "Re: How to dynamically load strong name assemblies"
- In reply to: Gerry Hickman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Next in thread: Sean Hederman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Reply: Sean Hederman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Reply: Gerry Hickman: "Re: VB vs C#"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|