RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: Thorsten Hindermann (Hindermann_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/01/05 

Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:53:02 -0800

Hello together,

alls what I say to this topic is: look at Windows SharePoint Services and
SharePoint Portal Server. These products are full ASP.NET (based on .NetFX
1.1) applications. Look at the Reporting Services for SQL Server 2000 and
last but not least at BizTalk Server 2004! Look the up coming SQL Server
2005, the new Windows Longhorn Shell (Codename MSH) and the Avalon CTP 2004
(for free download from the MS Public Server) based on .NetFX 2.0.

I think, this are a good starting point for .NetFX enabled applications!

"Herr Lucifer" <"\n" wrote:

> As the founder of .NET framework, Microsoft claims that it invention will be
> the next best platform for programming in a near future. Now it is 2005,
> ..NET is 5 years old, and can talk and walk for himself with some help of his
> mum.
> However, we see the same native office applications are coming out again,
> and many other tools in SP2 of XP which could be in managed code....but are
> not. So, as the inventor of .NET , why doesn't Microsoft itself use "DOTNET"
> in its applications? Is there any concern over the baby's runnung
> performance inside Microsoft itself, or they gonna teach the baby how to run
> like a C kinda guy in future, so that they'll be able to use it for
> themselves?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Relevant Pages