Re: Making a field/operation invisible for intellitip
From: Kevin Yu [MSFT] (v-kevy_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/18/04
- Next message: Steve Andrews: "DotNet & Crystal Reports - Data Environment"
- Previous message: Jim Hubbard: "Re: What good is one-click deployment?"
- In reply to: Lars-Erik Aabech: "Re: Making a field/operation invisible for intellitip"
- Next in thread: Lars-Erik Aabech: "Re: Making a field/operation invisible for intellitip"
- Reply: Lars-Erik Aabech: "Re: Making a field/operation invisible for intellitip"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:26:45 GMT
Hi Lars-Erick,
First of all, I would like to confirm my understanding of your issue. From
your description, I understand that you need to hide a method which is
derived from base class. If there is any misunderstanding, please feel free
to let me know.
I agree with Dennis's idea. As far as I know, this is impossible for us to
achieve this. Because according to the OOP specs, a derived class should
"support" all the base class methods. So if the based class is abstract, we
have to implement all it's methods.
HTH.
Kevin Yu
=======
"This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights."
- Next message: Steve Andrews: "DotNet & Crystal Reports - Data Environment"
- Previous message: Jim Hubbard: "Re: What good is one-click deployment?"
- In reply to: Lars-Erik Aabech: "Re: Making a field/operation invisible for intellitip"
- Next in thread: Lars-Erik Aabech: "Re: Making a field/operation invisible for intellitip"
- Reply: Lars-Erik Aabech: "Re: Making a field/operation invisible for intellitip"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|