Re: Damn frustrating problem :-(
From: thechaosengine (sh856531_at_microsofts_free_email_service.com)
Date: 12/07/04
- Previous message: Morten Wennevik: "Re: Getting started with SDK"
- In reply to: Peter N Roth: "Re: Damn frustrating problem :-("
- Next in thread: Peter N Roth: "Re: Damn frustrating problem :-("
- Reply: Peter N Roth: "Re: Damn frustrating problem :-("
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:30:00 -0000
> Field initialization
> The initial value of a field, whether it be a static field or an instance
> field, is the default value (§5.2) of the field's type. It is not possible
> to observe the value of a field before this default initialization has
> occurred, and a field is thus never "uninitialized".
Ok,
I'm not really sure what to make of that. How come, if I dont initialise, by
means of a constructor a string for example - its null until I give it
something?
Can you help
Thanks
- Previous message: Morten Wennevik: "Re: Getting started with SDK"
- In reply to: Peter N Roth: "Re: Damn frustrating problem :-("
- Next in thread: Peter N Roth: "Re: Damn frustrating problem :-("
- Reply: Peter N Roth: "Re: Damn frustrating problem :-("
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]