Re: The pros and cons of .NET
From: Cor Ligthert (notmyfirstname_at_planet.nl)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Sijin Joseph: "Re: colors in datagrid"
- Previous message: Maldonado: "Re: FTP Access"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: The pros and cons of .NET"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: The pros and cons of .NET"
- Reply: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: The pros and cons of .NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:25:06 +0200
> Cor Ligthert <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote:
>> The text "run Any Net program" can be explained wrong. However when I
>> place
>> it in the context as meant, it is right. (I am talking about C++)
>
> Where does C++ enter into this?
Is C++ a Net program? Does it needs always a runtimer, in my opinion not,
however when I am wrong in that, correct me because I thought that I had
always readed that it could be building on its roots and that Visual C++
.NET 2003 continues to enable developers to build entirely unmanaged
Windows-based applications and components. However maybe I understood that
wrong.
> But your answer was more misleading than Tim's web page, in my view.
I am not so much interested in your view, that I know already so long.
For the rest did I not write (exept in the first message before you state it
again) nothing else in the whole thread than what you wrote in your summary.
Cor
- Next message: Sijin Joseph: "Re: colors in datagrid"
- Previous message: Maldonado: "Re: FTP Access"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: The pros and cons of .NET"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: The pros and cons of .NET"
- Reply: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: The pros and cons of .NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]