Re: development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team
From: Ken Dopierala Jr. (kdopierala2_at_wi.rr.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Speed : The PIA impact (VB 6.0 vs VB.NET)"
- Previous message: Kevin Spencer: "Re: development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- In reply to: Akhlaq Khan: "development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- Next in thread: Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer) - MVP: "RE: development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:25:15 -0500
Hi,
This will link you to a presentation, almost 2 hours long, that will show
you how to set everything up in a few different ways:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;328845
Good luck! Ken.
-- Ken Dopierala Jr. For great ASP.Net web hosting try: http://www.webhost4life.com/default.asp?refid=Spinlight "Akhlaq Khan" <auzkhan@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:O6SZA5GpEHA.592@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > hi, > we have been working on web based applications built in ASP for quite > sometime now, but now we are moving to ASP.net. we have decided to use > ASP.NET for developing new modules in our current projects (built in ASP). > So, the applications will be composed of both ASP and ASP.NET pages > simultaneously. Since, ASP is a scripting language, it was easier for us to > put all the source code on a single web server, add the web to visual > soursafe using FP extentions in IIS, connect to the web applications from > development workstations using visual interdev and start checking files > in/out without any problem. the developers would test the effects of their > changes right on the web server by hitting refresh or F5. Everything takes > place on the web server, except code modification. > > now, since we are moving from a scripting language to a "compiled" language > (ASP.NET), that means the application would need to be "built" on > development workstations before being deployed on server (check in), since i > cannot expect my developers to build the application on server after every > single change they make on their own machine, coz they will keep switching > between machines forever. Moreover, i want the developers to be able to > "debug" their appliactions rigth on other workstations (i found out that > debugging is nearly impossible if application is placed on server, just like > it was in ASP 3.0). > > My question is: > > 1. What are the standard/recommended architectures for setting up > development environments for ASP.NET applications ? > 2. Which one should i use if i want to use a).visual sourcesafe for version > management. b) debugging capability for all developers on their own machines > rather than server, c) easier maintenance/no or least code synchronization > hassle. > > desparately waiting for response ... > > thanks, > > akhlaq khan. > >
- Next message: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Speed : The PIA impact (VB 6.0 vs VB.NET)"
- Previous message: Kevin Spencer: "Re: development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- In reply to: Akhlaq Khan: "development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- Next in thread: Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer) - MVP: "RE: development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
