Re: The pros and cons of .NET

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: JD (no_at_address.org)
Date: 09/25/04


Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:35:12 GMT

Cor,

Thanks for replying.

I do not think .NET is only a runtime and I never stated that, but my
concern was when you said there is no runtime and then go on further to say
its part of OS layer. Both of which I strongly disagree. But like Nick said
it may be a language thing.

JD

"Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:OuKxsAxoEHA.3392@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> JD,
>
> Before I start do not misunderstand me I find your contribution to this
> thread very well done.
>
> >In science, terminology and vocabulary is very important. It is called a
> > runtime. Microsoft calls it a runtime. The link you provided calls it a
> > runtime, it even provides a link to download the runtime
>
> In that page is spoken about (just copied.)
> "The .NET Framework consists of two main parts: the common language
runtime
> and the .NET Framework class library."
> Here is not written constist only of two parts or is a runtime.
>
> I do not reference furthermore to your text, because all those discusions
> where people are telling that the other one is wrong leads to nothing,
> nobody is wrong the only thing I try to do here is to get a better
> understanding and when you can convince me, that that is a benefit for me.
> And when I can convience you, do with it what you want.
>
> In my opinion and all times I had to do with a runtime was a runtime one
dll
> which translated the intermidiate code (in the same way you showed the
> layers, however than only one) to machine code(or API's).
>
> I have myself often called the .Net a runtime, because that is much easier
> to understand. (You can check the newsgroups from dotNet on Google and you
> will see that I told that often).
>
> However in my opinion did I not tell it right and I knew that I was wrong,
> it is in my opinion more than only a runtime.
>
> I will be glad when you can show me a link from Microsoft (not an MVP page
> or whatever) where Microsoft tells that .Net is abolute nothing more than
a
> runtime. Not that there is a runtime integrated that I know of course very
> good, but that is not that important, because in my opinion is the
> difference between a runtime and an API as well quit quick disputable.
> However with such a text on an official Microsoft page you can convince me
> completly.
>
> By the way talking about Microsoft employees does not say much, Microsoft
is
> not a company from only dotNet experts you know.
>
> To answer your last question, I have nowhere spoken that net is an
Operating
> System. I have consequently only spoken about a layer which can be used
upon
> the OS. (Not from myself by the way, just from a book)
>
> I hope this gives an idea why I wrote this.
>
> Cor
>
>
> "JD" <no@address.org>
> >
> > In science, terminology and vocabulary is very important. It is called a
> > runtime. Microsoft calls it a runtime. The link you provided calls it a
> > runtime, it even provides a link to download the runtime. The 20-30 some
> > odd
> > books I read about .NET call it a runtime. The .NET experts employed by
> > Microsoft that I have seen speak call it a runtime.
> >
> > The runtime provides these services: JIT, threads, garbage collection,
> > security, etc. Do not confuse these services with the same services
> > provided
> > by the Windows operating system, they are different. Example, .NET
managed
> > thread does not equal a Windows operating thread.
> >
> > Just because the operating system comes with the runtime does not make
it
> > part of the operating system. There are four runtimes that I know of:
> > Rotor,
> > MS CLR, Mono, and DotGNU. They all refer to this "service layer" as
> > runtime.
> > I can even compile an .exe by the MS VB.NET compiler and run it in the
> > CLR,
> > Mono and Rotor runtimes.
> >
> > Please, if you respond to this message at all, please answer at least
this
> > one question. If you don't call it a runtime, then what do you call it
> > exactly?
> >
> > JD
> >
> >
> > "Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote in message
> > news:uh0of8koEHA.800@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> I did not get it from this page, however I have now searched for this,
> > when
> >> Jon will call this a runtime that has to be downloaded he is free to
do,
> >> I
> >> did not answer Jon, Jon was answering me and I still disagree with him,
I
> >> agree with the documentation bellow.
> >>
> >> http://www.microsoft.com/net/basics/framework.asp
> >>
> >> An excuse would be normal, however that is not your style, we have
really
> >> not the same behaviour as you showed and I am very glad with that.
> >>
> >> I hope that Jon does not agree with the behaviour of you.
> >>
> >> Cor
> >>
> >> "Nick Malik" <nickmalik@hotmail.nospam.com>
> >>
> >> > Why do you do it, Jon?
> >> >
> >> > Why do you respond to Cor?
> >> >
> >> > He's clearly not on the same planet as the rest of the NG? He
doesn't
> >> > know
> >> > what he is talking about and he flaunts his ignorance at every turn.
> >> >
> >> > No one is confused by him. You gain nothing by arguing with him.
When
> >> > you
> >> > and he both answer a question, everone reads your answer, because we
> > know
> >> > that you have done something that Cor has not... you have taken the
> >> > time
> >> > to
> >> > learn the system.
> >> >
> >> > By responding to him, you waste your time, and we (those of us who
> >> > enjoy
> >> > reading your responses) are less fortunate for it.
> >> >
> >> > --- Nick
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: IPSEC Services Not Starting -Port Issue-
    ... You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. ... If I post that I think a server has been compromised because of the description of the problem, don't hit "reply" and start telling me I'm wrong about surfing on a server. ... This was nearly 4 weeks after the patch, ample time with microsoft resources to issue a fix the fix. ... As far as Trend Micro goes, It installed the firewall protocols on all workstations and server adapters even though i did not have it enabled, before upgrading to the latest version. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: CRN is Outta Their Tree--DARL MCBRIDE?
    ... I think many would argue that GPL software is beating Microsoft in ... Perhaps not yet in the marketplace. ... Since BSD cade can be used and turned into proprietary code by ... everyone is entitled to their own opinion. ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: How Microsoft lost the API War
    ... there are plenty of these people on the internet.So references per se are ... Microsoft employs a lot of very intelligent people, ... COM programming earn about $130,000 a year, while typical Web programmers ... but which don't support his opinion. ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general)
  • Re: How Microsoft lost the API War
    ... there are plenty of these people on the internet.So references per se are ... Microsoft employs a lot of very intelligent people, ... COM programming earn about $130,000 a year, while typical Web programmers ... but which don't support his opinion. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: rolling dice
    ... expense of Bill Gates and his software company. ... it _does_ reflect my real opinion. ... I use Microsoft software all the time, and it rarely crashes so I find it ... Most PC programs don't need to be ported to other platforms. ...
    (comp.lang.c)