Re: Optimizing code - is /O2 faster that /Ox ???
From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP] (skeet_at_pobox.com)
Date: 08/25/04
- Next message: Senthil: "Re: Error - procedure expects parameter, which was not supplied"
- Previous message: Derrick: "Should the order controls are added matter?"
- In reply to: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Optimizing code - is /O2 faster that /Ox ???"
- Next in thread: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Optimizing code - is /O2 faster that /Ox ???"
- Reply: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Optimizing code - is /O2 faster that /Ox ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:37:29 +0100
Cor Ligthert <notfirstname@planet.nl> wrote:
> > You still seem to have missed my point though: how can you assure us
> > that you know what's language specific when many of us have disagreed
> > with you about it in the past?
>
> I can answer this, maybe you can be that polite to answer the point about
> "Nothing to do with VB.Net before you take a new subject" although I show
> that there is a complete routine in the question from the OP for which he
> ask a beter one.
Sorry, I hardly understood a word of that, including the point you were
asking me to reply to. You you rephrase it?
> However the sentence above is again a constructive Jon Skeet sentence those
> "many" where 2 persons who where never active in the General newsgroup from
> who one was telling this (The messages from that person were at that time
> often to see in the C# newsgroup)..
3, including another MVP - in that single thread. There are other
threads, of course - this was just the example I was able to find
quickest.
> \\\a sentence from someone in the thread you talking about
> Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Why are you so keen to get *all* questions on the VB.NET newsgroup?
> >Hehe. It certainly makes one wonder.
> ///
> And the other one was Jay B, who reacted on a completly by youconstructive
> out of the context places sentence were I said "there were no answers given
> in this newsgroup except by me" while I meant "answers in this thread in the
> newsgroup except by me", however used by you directly in all folowing
> messages as if I was telling nobody would gives answers in this newsgroup
> except me.
Well, I read that comment from Jay as agreeing with my general point on
the thread, but I agree he might have been only agreeing with the
single post.
(The reason yours was the only answer to the OP in that thread was that
it was the only answer needed. It gave the right answer as well as the
(misplaced) redirection. Why should anyone give the same answer again?)
> You show exactly what I was meaning with my first question to Niki.
Shall we have a look at another example, then?
http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=MPG.1b17d1a18b9d542198a991%
40msnews.microsoft.com
It's another occasion you suggest using a VB group, despite the fact
that not only was there nothing VB-specific about the question, but in
fact the OP never mentioned VB at all! It turned out he was a C#
programmer in the first place...
You just seem a little too eager to redirect people to the VB group,
even when the question can easily be answered by people with no
detailed VB knowledge, and has benefit for people who don't use VB.
-- Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
- Next message: Senthil: "Re: Error - procedure expects parameter, which was not supplied"
- Previous message: Derrick: "Should the order controls are added matter?"
- In reply to: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Optimizing code - is /O2 faster that /Ox ???"
- Next in thread: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Optimizing code - is /O2 faster that /Ox ???"
- Reply: Cor Ligthert: "Re: Optimizing code - is /O2 faster that /Ox ???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
