Re: good hosting company for a developer please

From: Ken Dopierala Jr. (kdopierala2_at_wi.rr.com)
Date: 08/13/04 

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:51:52 -0500

Hi Beny,

This is who I use: http://www.WebHost4Life.com/default.asp?refid=Spinlight
If you go with the $9.95/month plan you can develop with ASP.Net and you'll
have 300MB worth of SQL server. Your limited to creating 2 SQL server
databases. Good luck! Ken.

"Beny" <Beny@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4977DE10-3190-41E0-9BBD-5F899B352F37@microsoft.com...
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I am Beny, a Canadian citizen currently working in Miami, Florida.
> My background is on computers, programming and the Internet.
>
> I am looking for a good hosting company. But I want it for me as a
> developer. Which implies developments on ASP. Net, Java, Database
> ( both MS Access and SQL ), Shopping carts, E-commerce, etc.
>
> That way after - only after - I fully develop my own applications
> and they work 100% okay, I would then offer my services to customers
> using perhaps the same company or else as hosting provider for
> my customers' sites.
>
> Please I want something good, I will gladly pay for it.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Beny
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SQL Logins vs Windows Authentication
    ... Windows Authentication to connect to the database. ... The hosting company says they are configured for SQL ... They use SQL Server 2005. ... I mean, your customers will not ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)
  • Re: SQL Logins vs Windows Authentication
    ... Windows Authentication to connect to the database. ... The hosting company says they are configured for SQL ... They use SQL Server 2005. ... I mean, your customers will not ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.security)
  • Re: SharePoint Services
    ... I'm under the impression that the data tables can be uploaded to a SharePoint location, and that read / edit permissions could be enabled for different users??? ... It was common for customers to have accounts in more than one store / town ... ... However if you do not have share point services setup, nor do you have the expertise and training and resource personnel to run and set up those servers + SharePoint, **if** you users NOW have some type of connection to you network, then then I think the easiest and least amount of effort would be to simply put the backend database on SQL server and and link your front ends to that back end user. ... So, if these people are outside of your corporate network now, then expertise and ability to set up secure connections to allow them to come into your corporate network and pull data from sql server is VERY seriuos issue. ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: SQL Server Royalty
    ... would the customer, but this "royalty premium"... ... > to work on its database. ... > in house applications using SQL Server to other databases ... >>> customers this 'premium' if customers want to use their ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clients)
  • Re: Assume SQL Server Rights for apps, any cons?
    ... Since your customer is the sysadmin on his SQL Server box, ... >administrates the underlying SQL Server 2000 database by himself. ... >wants that my software assumes the user rights automatically from the SQL ... >My application offers a GUI to manage customers. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)