Re: Tutorial for Linux, Mono and ASP.Net

From: Tony Baker (baker_tony_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/16/04


Date: 16 Jul 2004 08:36:44 -0700


> My favorite site is: http://www.linuxiso.org/
> you can get just about any distro available there. As you are
> probably rusty with linux I would recommend either Mandrake or
> Fedora Core 2, As they both have easy installers and do a great
> job of autodetecting your hardware.

Cool! Thanks heaps for all your replies so far, I'm downloading Fedora
Core 2 over the weekend and will no doubt have fun installing it on a
VMWare virtual machine next week!



Relevant Pages

  • Re: xcdroast
    ... Fedora Core 3 and Mandrake are easiest with FreeBSD and OpenBSD ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Fedora or Mandrake?
    ... > I have WinXP Pro and Fedora Core 2 running just fine. ... > mean by hosing up the windows partition. ... Documentation in English is available for both, although the Mandrake ... This did not happen on every install, ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)
  • Re: Second Best Linux?
    ... > anything about Linux, but I am about to start reading the books I bought ... Mandrake 10.1 is the easiest to use closely followed by Fedora Core 3. ... partitions when you do your first install so that you have places to put ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)
  • Re: will linux survive the fagmenting/forking
    ... ]> Using hda2's RH6.2 is not possible since the layout of Mandrake ... ]> Every where I turn and look there are incompatibilities. ... ]> But help is already here - Fedora Core is linux for everyone. ... ]> of creative effort has gone into fedora core. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: FC3 versus Mandrake
    ... > I have heard a lot about the superiority of Fedora Core 3 versus ... Could someone here please explain to me why is Fedora Core 3 ... > superior to Mandrake? ... guide, but it ain't so good as the FC's. ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)