Re: Best choice of technology
From: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\) [MVP] (NoSpamMgbworld_at_comcast.netNoSpamM)
Date: 07/07/04
- Next message: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\) [MVP]: "Re: What are Visual Studio 2005 Express Products?"
- Previous message: Ajit: "tranparency problem with different systems"
- In reply to: JohnFol: "Best choice of technology"
- Next in thread: JohnFol: "Re: Best choice of technology"
- Reply: JohnFol: "Re: Best choice of technology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:55:46 -0500
For pure processing of data, I would consider creating a DTS task in SQL
Server. You can partially monitor it, so it may not be choice #1. In SQL
Server 2005, you have more monitoring options.
You can export DTS code to VB and set up a process to figure out where you
are.
With .NET you can make a service that runs these DTS processes. It will have
to use COM interop.
You can also roll your own DTS with a .NET service. The service option is
nice, as you can set up hooks to more easily monitor. The executable hooks
into the service and checks status, et al.
-- Gregory A. Beamer MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA ************************************************ Think Outside the Box! ************************************************ "JohnFol" <Wibble@wobble.com> wrote in message news:OE%23x6BCZEHA.808@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > I have a requirement to run some code on a server. The purpose of the code > is purely to process data between an MS SQL box and a remote Oracle box. It > has no UI, and needs no user intervention to run. > > The 2nd part of the requirement is to have a UI that will allow an operator > to view the progress / current status of the processing. Even if the UI is > not loaded, the processing must continue. > > I have a few ideas on how to tackle this, but would welcome opinions. > > Any ideas most welcome. > >
- Next message: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\) [MVP]: "Re: What are Visual Studio 2005 Express Products?"
- Previous message: Ajit: "tranparency problem with different systems"
- In reply to: JohnFol: "Best choice of technology"
- Next in thread: JohnFol: "Re: Best choice of technology"
- Reply: JohnFol: "Re: Best choice of technology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|