It's All IBM
From: Arapahoe (now_at_playing.playing)
Date: 07/06/04
- Next message: Alan Chen: "non static class member a TLS?"
- Previous message: Andy: "Asyc UDP Connectionless - Capturing Remote Endpoint - IPAddress"
- Next in thread: Patricia: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply:(deleted message) Patricia: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: Quantum Leaper: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: Herman Family: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Maybe reply:(deleted message) Patricia: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: tadchem: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: Highly Critical: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 01:54:19 GMT
When you really boil it down...in the last 60 years of computing...it's
really all been IBM.
I mean, I've been reading this book "Hackers" which goes through all the
*underground* computer movements and DEC, and Altair and probably if I
bother to keep reading, Apple and so on.
But you know, as I see it -- basically computing is divided into 3 epochs.
I) The IBM Mainframe - 1950 to 1980
The Mainframe was all that really mattered in computing for those 30
years. You could take all the /hacking/ and DEC and minicomputers and
flush them down the toilet and what would be left is the real computing.
The computing of commerce and industry that really /comupterized/
America. The computing of Defense and Simulation.
And 99 percent of that was on IBM mainframes.
II) The IBM PC - 1980 to 2000
The basic architecture of the PC that is used by 96 percent of the world
was developed by IBM -- and that architecture is still in use today.
The IBM PC is 2nd to the mainframe in design and importance in
computing. Apple is about as important as the Altair. A trivial
implementation, before IBM came up with the machine that Corporate
America really wanted.
III) IBM and Linux, 2000-???
Oh, did you notice that I left Microsoft off this short list? That is
because IBM was planning a PC with a multitasking OS as early as the
1960s. They called it basically a Smart Terminal because it could
offload some of the server processing. And that's about what most PCs
do, because real processing is done on servers. As far as Microsoft
goes, I see them as a transitory period -- basically allowing PC
hardware to mature up to the point that UNIX -- a reall OS -- could be
allowed to run on PCs. And now it does.
- Next message: Alan Chen: "non static class member a TLS?"
- Previous message: Andy: "Asyc UDP Connectionless - Capturing Remote Endpoint - IPAddress"
- Next in thread: Patricia: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply:(deleted message) Patricia: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: Quantum Leaper: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: Herman Family: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Maybe reply:(deleted message) Patricia: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: tadchem: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Reply: Highly Critical: "Re: It's All IBM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|