Re: Customer fairness policy
From: Marina (someone_at_nospam.com)
Date: 06/03/04
- Previous message: David Rogers: "Developer Needed FT Position"
- In reply to: Zennaka: "Customer fairness policy"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Customer fairness policy"
- Reply: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Customer fairness policy"
- Reply: C# Learner: "Re: Customer fairness policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:07:05 -0400
I'm sure I'm going to get attacked for this, but Netscape users compromise a
fairly small percentage of internet users, so I don't think it is
unreasonable to not worry about them. There are some things that Netscape
just can't do, that IE can - and because of this sometimes there is no
choice but to use IE to provide certain functionality.
Having said that, I think you can still use the .NET framework and utilitze
its usefullness, but retain all the client side logic you've already written
and not rely on the .NET validators. It might mean doing a little bit more
by hand, but it might be worth it if a little bit more effort makes it easy
for you to support all browsers.
"Zennaka" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AB9B3BD9-CE4C-4C5C-BEFD-351D4F30A2FA@microsoft.com...
> Hi. I'm doing a .NET conversion project (from ASP + VB) and I don't know
what decision I should take with respect to data validation.
> One of the requirements was to "treat all customers the same way", that is
why data validation JavaScript code was carefullly written to work for both
IE and Netscape (old and new versions). Now, all these validation control
techniques make it extremely easy to program for IE, but they kinda suc.k
for Netscape. For example, if the user clicks the "Login" button on a page
with RequiredFieldValidators, in IE you get an instantanous response, as
opposed to Netscape where a trip to the server is necessary.
> I wanted the utilize the full potential of .NET, but this is a setback.
This requirement is not very important, but if possible, it should be done.
> I would like to know what do the other companies/consultants out there
think about this issue.
>
> Thanks
> TIA
- Previous message: David Rogers: "Developer Needed FT Position"
- In reply to: Zennaka: "Customer fairness policy"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Customer fairness policy"
- Reply: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: Customer fairness policy"
- Reply: C# Learner: "Re: Customer fairness policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|