Re: Questions about the DLR

Jon Skeet [C# MVP] wrote:
If you want something for free, try Eclipse: http://www.eclipse.org

Thanks...I'll check it out.

Rather than rehash all my old grumbles, have a look at:

http://msmvps.com/blogs/jon.skeet/archive/2005/12/22/79631.aspx

Well, I appreciate the perspective. I admit, many of your complaints are hard for me to relate to. I've spent so much of my life coding outside of an IDE, that _any_ IDE seems like such a nice upgrade. :) But I know I like VS2005 a lot more than the previous times I've used VS (it's the only version of VS that I've used extensively).

It's amusing to me, for some reason, to think that things could be even better. :) I suppose when I'm fed up enough with VS, I'll look into the alternatives.

Pete
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: VS2005 Satisfaction Guaranteed?
    ... complacent having had good experience with previous version of the product ... VS2005 Professional available to you before you spent all the money: ... liked - they're missing some features but the IDE is the same. ...
    (microsoft.public.vstudio.development)
  • Re: VS2005 Satisfaction Guaranteed?
    ... Professional available to you before you spent all the money: ... liked - they're missing some features but the IDE is the same. ...
    (microsoft.public.vstudio.development)
  • Re: Questions about the DLR
    ... I've spent so much of my life coding ... outside of an IDE, that _any_ IDE seems like such a nice upgrade. ... Likewise compile-on-save with a really fast incremental compiler ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Growing quite disappointed
    ... > direction or the adapted technologies. ... Yeah, well, complaints about the company's direction are not new ... IDE for its Pascal-based language. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: A whiter Delphi
    ... > it does appear that the Borland resources being spent on the Galileo IDE ... > would be better spent on the language itself, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)