Re: Thread safety of events
- From: "Peter Duniho" <NpOeStPeAdM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:54:57 -0700
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:49:27 -0700, Armin Zingler <az.nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
O2 doesn't "catch" events at all.
No, it does. I wouldn't say it if it didn't. "Catch" is short for "contains a procedure that is the event handler of an event of" - I thought, this is a common term.
In .NET, "catch" is typically used for exceptions, while "handles" is typically used for events.
While I might find less point in quibbling over the semantics than John, if we're going to argue about common usage, John's point is correct. "Catch" is not at all a common term used to describe event handling.
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thread safety of events
- From: Armin Zingler
- Re: Thread safety of events
- From: William Stacey [C# MVP]
- Re: Thread safety of events
- References:
- Thread safety of events
- From: Armin Zingler
- Re: Thread safety of events
- From: John Saunders [MVP]
- Re: Thread safety of events
- From: Armin Zingler
- Thread safety of events
- Prev by Date: Re: Maintain list of attached event handlers (.Net 1.1)
- Next by Date: Re: Maintain list of attached event handlers (.Net 1.1)
- Previous by thread: Re: Thread safety of events
- Next by thread: Re: Thread safety of events
- Index(es):