Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- From: "Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]" <cpdaniel_remove_this_and_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:42:58 -0800
Scott M. wrote:
"Milosz Skalecki" <mily242@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:60B89036-6DAF-41AD-BE41-0D180747C7D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Howdy Scott,
My point was sentence written by you:
"ActiveX is just a specific type of COM interface." which i
disagreed. From
architectural point of view, COM, OLE, ActiveX objects have to only
implement
IUnknown interface. It's not a specific or special type of COM
interface it's
just another name for the same technology. See Microsoft spec:
But hold on a sec. ActiveX (and OLE) are specific types of COM
libraries. You can't very well say that all COM libraries are ActiveX.
It's nearly true. MSFT re-defined exactly what an Active-X control a few
times with the final defintion being basically "any self-registering
in-process COM server".
-cd
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- From: Scott M.
- Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- References:
- Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- From: Scott M.
- Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- From: Scott M.
- Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- Prev by Date: Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- Next by Date: Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- Previous by thread: Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- Next by thread: Re: difference between a .dll and .ocx????
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|