Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- From: "Roland" <roland.demeester@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:05:13 +0200
John, you mean that in that case the dll is executing the code of the CLR
loaded by the exe?
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <skeet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1fa5698c8c9a159a98d56b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Roland <roland.demeester@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is it possible to call a dll that was compiled against 1.1 when the exe
is
compiled against 2.0?
I have bought some dll's that are compiled against 1.1 and, obviously, I
don't have the source code. I hate to buy all libraries again each time
Microsoft moves its frzamework forward.
Yes, that should be fine. There are a few changes between 1.1 and 2.0
which aren't backward-compatible, and if the libraries rely on the
original behaviour then you may have problems, but those are pretty
rare.
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- References:
- A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- From: Roland
- Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- Prev by Date: Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- Next by Date: Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- Previous by thread: Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- Next by thread: Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|