Is it possible to call a dll that was compiled against 1.1 when the exe is
compiled against 2.0?
I have bought some dll's that are compiled against 1.1 and, obviously, I
don't have the source code. I hate to buy all libraries again each time
Microsoft moves its frzamework forward.
Roland
Re: A question on 1.1 and 2.0 interoperability ...Roland wrote: ... loaded by the exe?... So long as the DLL doesn't rely on 1.1-specific behaviour, ...Jon Skeet - ... (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
Re: Editors ... some strip them on exe files by default. ... "preferred base address" and, yup, relocations are completely ...DLL files, though, aren't loaded into their own address space but are ... EXE's "entry-point", though, is not "special" in that it's just an ... (alt.lang.asm)
Re: DLL pass vector by value crash ... The prototype for testfunc is a by-value copy, so it has to make a copy of the value. ... Are you using static linking for either the .exe (if so, it probably won't work correctly, ... clearly using the shared CRT DLL for the DLL you are constructing. ... no crash occurs in either config.... (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
Re: DLL pass vector by value crash ... stack of the exe and may allocate default member element on the exe heap. ... If this is a dangerous situation, the simple app I set up calling testFunc()... in a dll did not crash. ... msvcr90.dll!free and access the source code of free.c. ... (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
Re: Releasing my VB.NET app over the intranet ... of the primary EXE and when compiled I am copying the contents ... the directory and open a browser on the web server and type ... > another dll, we need to put the dll in the same directory, so that the clr ... > The executable will be downloaded to the assembly download cache on the ... (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
