Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: "Robin Theilade" <nospam.robin.theilade.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:51:14 +0200
Hi Vadym,
You're probably right about that.
I was going to lookup the DirectPlay you mentioned when I found this FAQ
entry http://www.thezbuffer.com/articles/387.aspx. I guess I'll have to go
with the multiple sockets solution.
Thanks for the help.
Best regards,
Robin Theilade
"Vadym Stetsyak" <vadym_s@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eFdvtDpeGHA.3484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello, Robin!
RT> You're right about that, but still it is not unusual that someone
RT> builds some kind of proxy and my guess was that the .NET framework
RT> already such a class to handle multiple ports. Consider the
RT> opposite case where you have serveral clients; here the Socket class
RT> supports multicast to send the same data to all the clients. I know
RT> that it is not interely the same but it proves that the Socket class
in
RT> special cases can handle multiple addresses. So it was just a small
RT> hope.
Actually multicasting is also happening on single address, multicast
address :8-). So, there is still
host/port couple out there.
--
Regards, Vadym Stetsyak
www: http://vadmyst.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Kevin Spencer
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- References:
- UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Robin Theilade
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Kevin Spencer
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Robin Theilade
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Robin Theilade
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Robin Theilade
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Kevin Spencer
- Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- From: Robin Theilade
- UDP socket with multiple ports
- Prev by Date: Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- Next by Date: Re: FoxPro Date Processing
- Previous by thread: Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- Next by thread: Re: UDP socket with multiple ports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|