Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

Hi Heath,

I am developing a windows application using visual studio.net 2003. I am
using bundled version of Crystal Report for reporting purpose. I dont have
seperate licence version of Crystal Report.

My main concern is can I deploy this application at client side, bacause
client is only having licence version of .NET Frameword 1.1. So if I deploy
this application at client side, will my crystal report work properly? Or
client need licence version of Crystal Report.

Thanks in advance.
Shailesh

"Heath Stewart [MSFT]" wrote:

Tim did say that architects and developers should consider what
languages/platforms are best for their needs. He did state that .NET isn't
really for real-time applications.

Performance can be better by following certain guidelines. If you leave all
your memory to be collected by the GC you will suffer performance penalties
at some point. If you free your memory - perhaps by following the disposable
pattern for managed memory as well as native handles - you can
deterministically free memory so that the GC doesn't lock the threads while
collecting later.

Rico Mariani's blog at http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/default.aspx is a good
place to read about performance, not just for managed code but native as
well. So is Raymond Chen's blog at
http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/default.aspx.

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft


"Prem Kumar" wrote:

Hi,

I am a software engineer in .net since 3 years

I am huge supporter of each and every tech. developed from microsoft


But ...

Mr Tim Wilson , you must accept that your this .net fantacy is not mean for
real time software . no matter how less time the GC takes

Beacuse for realtime applicatons the most bigges reqirement is that its main
thread must not be paused at any cause , but this is the frequent case in
any application developed using .net framework

U should accept that Microsoft is not really concetrating to produce a
really good programming platform.

they are just doing like

"Handing over a toy to a crying child"

Thats why , even after the advent of .net (5 yeast elapsed) they could not
beat the Java in market.

Event i am strongly attached with Microsoft and its technologies


Do reply me what do you think about this at


prem.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,
prem.net@xxxxxxxxx

Prem Kumar
Associate software Engineer
Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited
Navi Mumbai
Vashi
India

"Tim Wilson" wrote:

Microsoft is happy that they forced their "new" platform
down someone's throat.
Wrong. In the "C" world you still have choice. C++ works just fine. No one
forces you to use .NET.

My q to them is why did you create .NET then?
Simple... because not all applications require real-time behavior. In fact,
I would argue that most applications do not require real-time behavior. So,
yes, .NET *may* not be the best way to go in these scenarios. You answered
your own "q". Any architect, or developer for that matter, should do their
homework before deciding how an application should be written. Use the
proper tools for the proper tasks. Microsoft gives developers options and
it's your job to decide when and how to use them.

--
Tim Wilson
..Net Compact Framework MVP

<consumer62000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126304861.816577.277870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Let me tell you a scenario and you will see what I mean.
There is a large application that has communication with a real time
system . The app has to respond to the requests in no more than 1 s.
The app is a C# .NET app and everything is fine and everyone at
Microsoft is happy that they forced their "new" platform down someone's
throat.

Now imagine a scenario where the GC has to collect the memory. Well,
when GC runs all the threads are suspended and there is no response to
the incoming requests and application fails a critical requirement.

Well,any MS people here who can defend their sucky product,
I know they will say "don't use .NET for this or that...use C or C++
etc"
My q to them is why did you create .NET then?




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 17 Minutes With Bill Gates
    ... That is true for you, for me, for Bill Gates, and for the President of the ... If you are a developer, ... It is not possible to be universally popular. ... There are many ways Microsoft can make a very ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: 17 Minutes With Bill Gates
    ... That is true for you, for me, for Bill Gates, and for the ... If you are a developer, ... popular is an outgrowth of this. ... There are many ways Microsoft ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: 17 Minutes With Bill Gates
    ... lives in a eutopia that is not reality and thus his persception is based on ... Seeing as I am a developer in the real world, ... Microsoft applications/tools are engineered for what turns out to be about ... "His vision of reality" therefore is ambiguous at best. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: 17 Minutes With Bill Gates
    ... I'm assuming you're a developer, someone who employs logic on a daily basis. ... vision of reality" therefore is ambiguous at best. ... Microsoft like all large organizations through out history have become ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Senior Developer looking for your asst in employmt issue (not job seeking!)
    ... In light of your boss's instructions to you to use "a Microsoft ... your boss wanted to get rid of Access entirely, ... that you are not an incompetent developer. ... >front end linked to a SQL Server database. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.database)