Re: Unwanted .Net framework dependency

Great deal! Sometimes a shot in the dark works!

"Harry Hanley" <harry.hanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:YZjyf.217477$V7.27386@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> That was it exactly, one library was needlessly set as "managed".
>
> Many regards,
>
> Harry Hanley
>
>
> "Gabriel Magaña" <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OaQuSJJGGHA.3896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Ugh... I'd try asking the people over at
>> microsoft.public.dotnet.langauges.vc or microsoft.public.vc.ide_general
>> or the other vc.* NGs...
>>
>> Otherwise I'd suggest the obvious: Check each and every option on your
>> C++ project, and turn off anything that mentions "managed".
>>
>> "Harry Hanley" <harry.hanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:0SVxf.215434$V7.195078@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Be cause users can no longer run the app without installing
>>> dotnetfx.exe... a 20 mG download.
>>>
>>> -Harry
>>>
>>> "Gabriel Magaña" <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:OsEReAJGGHA.3856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> So how do you know the dependency is there? Only at the time of
>>>> install?
>>>>
>>>> "Harry Hanley" <harry.hanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:LJVxf.215430$V7.51688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>I cannot find the dependency. This is the main problem. I do not know
>>>>>where it came from nor where it is only that customers cannot run
>>>>>without installing dotnetfx.exe.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Harry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Gabriel Magaña" <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:eQ7e0qIGGHA.208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Remove the dependency and recompile to see if anything breaks?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Harry Hanley" <harry.hanley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Y3Vxf.215399$V7.170338@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Somehow my application has developed a dependency on the .Net
>>>>>>> framework.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a C++ app built much the same as one would have with Visual
>>>>>>> Studio 6.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We were happily using Visual Studio .Net 2003 with no dependency on
>>>>>>> the .Net framework. Somewhere along the line someone must have
>>>>>>> accidentally clicked were they shouldn't have and the dependency
>>>>>>> arose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone have any clues as to where to start to look to remove
>>>>>>> this dependency?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Harry Hanley
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOSPAMharry.hanley@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (remove NOSPAM to reply)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Odditorium (SI) Review..
    ... Maybe a little extra contrast, maybe a crop to remove the dark ... Good shot as usual. ... - this sort of scene would benefit from a little less blown sky.. ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
  • Re: How did you come to believe what you believe? (was Re: Predestination) (was Poor people)
    ... Suddenly, a shot ... > gekko wrote: ... >> It was a dark and stormy night in misc.writing. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • [SI] Low Light
    ... -This is awfully dark and I wonder when that is appropriate to show a dark scene as dark, ... -I shot a bunch that night at ISO 1600 but I wonder if those are so grainy, ... Mardon Erbland - wife by candlelight in mirror ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
  • Re: tallit katan
    ... I wouldn't say shot down, either, but more of a shot ... >>> For example, I would consider myself a religious Reform Jew, though ... I am actively engaged in my religious practice and study. ... >> Best regards, ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: Opening up password protected Microsoft Office files in Linux
    ... company that brought you Active-X and spyware, put "passwords" on some ... bunch of graphics is really all you need-do "man strings"): ... Again, shot in the dark, YMMV, HTH... ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)