Re: I have 2 versions of .NET, which is being used

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

Lloyd Dupont wrote:
> That doesn't address your concern that there are so few .NET based
> app on Vista.
> Well I don't know...
> Maybe you should ask them, I believe you sometimes go at redmond?

I have, but I am not saying the answer I got, but it wasn't encouraging
<g>

> Or ask Paul Thurot if you know him?

Nope, I've never met him and he doesn't reply to my emails.

> However since even my elder sister got a computer powerfull enough to
> run all the app
> I wan to show her without problem, I came to believe that every
> computer is powerfull
> enough nowadays.

hah ha, perhaps she would like to swap with one of mine, I could do with
a faster machine ;-)

The problem is that when you have an organization with lots of machines
getting them all up to spec is costly. Even if that means putting in
just $50 of memory, you have to factor in the downtime of the machine
and the cost of the engineer to install the memory.

> In fact you have to download it... However:
> - We are using eSellerate to sell off the web, and they could send
> you a CD. - We have many resellers, some of them are such shop. but I
> don't
> know the exact reseller list.

It would be interesting to see how it sells. If you sell it via CD then
installing the framework is a no brainer. However, it would be
interesting to see how your customers who download it will react to the
indication that they need to download another 25Mb from Microsoft.

>> so I can tell you that MFC is far superior to Windows Forms.
> Don't repeat it, and don't tell anyone I told you, but I think
> (Java's) Swing is, too,
> far superior to Winform.

:-)

Richard
--
Fusion Tutorial: http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/workshops/fusionWS.htm
Security Tutorial:
http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/workshops/securityWS.htm


.

Relevant Pages