Re: I have 2 versions of .NET, which is being used


> I agree. Even Microsoft are reluctant about writing code in .NET.
> (at least until Windows Vista has been out for a while since it will have
> native .NET
> support)..
>
>> No it won't. See: http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/dotnet/vistaAndDotnet.htm
>
> (I have taken results for build 5270, but not updated that article yet.
> But basically 5270 has precious few .NET apps.)

I'm not sure what it is you are saying here. That article just confirms
that Windows Vista *will* have native *support* for .NET and that is what I
said. I did not say that Windows Vista would be built to run as a .NET
application. What I meant was that if someone has Vista, then they can run
..NET apps. because .NET support is native to the OS, unlike .NET in XP,
which must be added as a Windows Update item.

-Scott


.

Loading