Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- From: "Jorgm" <Jorgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:19:11 -0700
"Prem Kumar" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a software engineer in .net since 3 years
>
> I am huge supporter of each and every tech. developed from microsoft
>
>
> But ...
>
> Mr Tim Wilson , you must accept that your this .net fantacy is not mean for
> real time software . no matter how less time the GC takes
>
> Beacuse for realtime applicatons the most bigges reqirement is that its main
> thread must not be paused at any cause , but this is the frequent case in
> any application developed using .net framework
>
> U should accept that Microsoft is not really concetrating to produce a
> really good programming platform.
>
> they are just doing like
>
> "Handing over a toy to a crying child"
>
> Thats why , even after the advent of .net (5 yeast elapsed) they could not
> beat the Java in market.
>
> Event i am strongly attached with Microsoft and its technologies
>
>
> Do reply me what do you think about this at
>
>
> prem.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,
> prem.net@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Prem Kumar
> Associate software Engineer
> Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited
> Navi Mumbai
> Vashi
> India
>
> "Tim Wilson" wrote:
>
> > > Microsoft is happy that they forced their "new" platform
> > > down someone's throat.
> > Wrong. In the "C" world you still have choice. C++ works just fine. No one
> > forces you to use .NET.
> >
> > > My q to them is why did you create .NET then?
> > Simple... because not all applications require real-time behavior. In fact,
> > I would argue that most applications do not require real-time behavior. So,
> > yes, .NET *may* not be the best way to go in these scenarios. You answered
> > your own "q". Any architect, or developer for that matter, should do their
> > homework before deciding how an application should be written. Use the
> > proper tools for the proper tasks. Microsoft gives developers options and
> > it's your job to decide when and how to use them.
> >
> > --
> > Tim Wilson
> > ..Net Compact Framework MVP
> >
> > <consumer62000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1126304861.816577.277870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Let me tell you a scenario and you will see what I mean.
> > > There is a large application that has communication with a real time
> > > system . The app has to respond to the requests in no more than 1 s.
> > > The app is a C# .NET app and everything is fine and everyone at
> > > Microsoft is happy that they forced their "new" platform down someone's
> > > throat.
> > >
> > > Now imagine a scenario where the GC has to collect the memory. Well,
> > > when GC runs all the threads are suspended and there is no response to
> > > the incoming requests and application fails a critical requirement.
> > >
> > > Well,any MS people here who can defend their sucky product,
> > > I know they will say "don't use .NET for this or that...use C or C++
> > > etc"
> > > My q to them is why did you create .NET then?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
.
- Prev by Date: Re: MD5CryptoServiceProvider creates different hashes for the same fil
- Next by Date: Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- Previous by thread: Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- Next by thread: Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
