Re: Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- From: "Carl Mercier" <carl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:29:47 -0400
The problem is that .NET 2.0 is just around the corner, and we'll have to
deploy a whole new set of runtime libraries, once again!
Regarding Thinstall load up time, I doubt there's a difference with regular
..NET applications. Even with the framework preinstalled on a machine, your
application will need to load it. It would be nice to see some benchmarks
for both.
Carl
"Nick Z." <pacemkr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5VLZe.27$Xq.15@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Thats what I'm betting on. I heard somewhere that 68% of machines already
> have .net installed, whatever that means. Is there any official figure or
> some authoritative estimate on that?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- From: Roel Oost
- Re: Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- References:
- Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- From: pacemkr
- Re: Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- From: Roel Oost
- Re: Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- From: Nick Z.
- Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- Prev by Date: Re: cannot install 64bit Net SDK 2.0 Beta
- Next by Date: Dotfuscator
- Previous by thread: Re: Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- Next by thread: Re: Run .NET Appllications without runtime.
- Index(es):