Re: regex - should be simple
- From: lit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Sep 2005 12:07:30 -0700
Thanks David, Oliver,
You are right, both solutions work. I must have made a mistake when I
tested (.*);(.*) earlier.
regards,
leo
.
- References:
- regex - should be simple
- From: lit
- Re: regex - should be simple
- From: Oliver Sturm
- Re: regex - should be simple
- From: David Browne
- Re: regex - should be simple
- From: Oliver Sturm
- regex - should be simple
- Prev by Date: Re: regex - should be simple
- Next by Date: Compile Error: Could not copy temporary files to the output directory.
- Previous by thread: Re: regex - should be simple
- Next by thread: Re: regex - should be simple
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|