Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- From: "Sahil Malik [MVP]" <contactmethrumyblog@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:03:40 -0400
Well, C++ rulz maybe correct, but it is still harder to work with when
compared with C# etc. Also fully managed code is safer in general. The point
of my previous post was, you can still use dotnet and avoid C++ by just a
little bit of clever thinking out of the box. Of course not everything is
do-able through purely managed code, but 99.999% is acheivable.
--
- Sahil Malik [MVP]
ADO.NET 2.0 book -
http://codebetter.com/blogs/sahil.malik/archive/2005/05/13/63199.aspx
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"hB" <habib.ahmed@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126458938.320089.161420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I know c++ rulz! :P
> But dont blame dotnet for your poorly designed OR poorly coded (by your
> peers) app.
>
> ---
> hB
>
.
- References:
- Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- From: Richard Blewett [DevelopMentor]
- Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- From: Sahil Malik [MVP]
- Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- From: hB
- Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- Prev by Date: Re: Zip File Class?
- Next by Date: RE: Bug in FileStream.Dispose in Framework 1.1
- Previous by thread: Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- Next by thread: Re: .NET SUCKS --- READ FOLLOWING. MICROSOFT IS A SUCKY CO
- Index(es):