Re: Atomicity Question
- From: Cool Guy <coolguy@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:14:09 +0100
I wrote:
> Actually -- come to think of it, I need to *lock* instead (i.e. not use a
> volatile variable) in the code which prompted me to ask this question,
> anyway.
It's quite obvious to me now that in the code in question I had to use
locking, but when I first realised there might be a problem my brain was
working so hard that I was 'blind' to this.
I hate multi-threading. :-(
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Atomicity Question
- From: Lloyd Dupont
- Re: Atomicity Question
- References:
- Atomicity Question
- From: Cool Guy
- Re: Atomicity Question
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: Atomicity Question
- From: Cool Guy
- Atomicity Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Atomicity Question
- Next by Date: About not implement painting for control class
- Previous by thread: Re: Atomicity Question
- Next by thread: Re: Atomicity Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|