Re: WinXPx64 question
From: Bruno Jouhier [MVP] (bjouhier_at_club-internet.fr)
Date: 03/19/05
- Next message: Natan: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Previous message: swayam: "asking for a connection between VB6 and Excel Data"
- In reply to: Timothy V: "WinXPx64 question"
- Next in thread: Thomas Scheidegger [MVP]: "Re: WinXPx64 question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:45:35 +0100
"Timothy V" <tripix@msn.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
uKL372ALFHA.1156@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have a question regarding the .NET Framework 2.0 and x64. I realise
> these are still in beta, but I hope someone can help me.
>
> If i had dotnet2.0x64 installed on winxpx64. Does an application compiled
> on a winxpx86 (using dotnet2.0x86) require the x86 or x64 edition of
> dotnet2.0?
>
> I'll try to rephrase that a little better just in case you didn't get it.
> Does a 32bit .net application require the 32bit .net framework edition, or
> can it use the 64bit .net framework edition?
VS 2005 has a new setting that lets you specify whether your assembly will
target x86, x64 or both cpus. The default mode is to target both cpus. With
this setting, the same assembly can run either on x86 or x64, and the JIT
takes care of the differences.
Marking the assembly as x86 or x64 is useful if your assembly relies on
unmanaged DLLs that don't exist in both flavors.
Bruno.
>
> Thanks guys,
>
> Tim.
>
- Next message: Natan: "Re: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??"
- Previous message: swayam: "asking for a connection between VB6 and Excel Data"
- In reply to: Timothy V: "WinXPx64 question"
- Next in thread: Thomas Scheidegger [MVP]: "Re: WinXPx64 question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
